Fix tpcds planning stack overflows - Join planning refactoring#9962
Merged
alamb merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom Apr 5, 2024
Merged
Fix tpcds planning stack overflows - Join planning refactoring#9962alamb merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
alamb merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
alamb
approved these changes
Apr 5, 2024
Contributor
alamb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you @Jefffrey -- this is a great improvement
I tested it locally too. On main:
$ cargo test --test tpcds_planning
...
test tpcds_physical_q5 ... ok
thread 'tpcds_physical_q54' has overflowed its stack
fatal runtime error: stack overflow
error: test failed, to rerun pass `-p datafusion --test tpcds_planning`On this branch:
$ cargo test --test tpcds_planning
test result: ok. 192 passed; 0 failed; 6 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 1.08s| echo "RUSTC_WRAPPER=sccache" >> $GITHUB_ENV | ||
| echo "SCCACHE_GHA_ENABLED=true" >> $GITHUB_ENV | ||
| echo "RUST_BACKTRACE=1" >> $GITHUB_ENV | ||
| echo "RUST_MIN_STACK=3000000" >> $GITHUB_ENV |
Contributor
|
FYI @comphead |
Contributor
|
wow! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #8837
Rationale for this change
Thanks to the previous analysis from #1047 and with some lldb debugging, was able to identify that
create_initial_plan(...)and it's siblingcreate_initial_plan_multi(...)were the culprits for the stack overflow (also identified by this comment #8837 (comment))So went looking through it and found a place were there was a large number of local variables before the recursive call to
create_initial_plan(...)/create_initial_plan_multi(...)and tested out extracting those into a separate function. This seems to resolve the issue.What changes are included in this PR?
Extract local variables and functionality in physical join planning in
create_initial_plan(...)to a separate function to try reduce stack size before the recursivecreate_initial_plan(...)callAre these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?