-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement protobuf serialization for AnalyzeExec #7574
Conversation
AnalyzeExec
AnalyzeExec
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the contribution @Adish20 -- much appreciated.
I think the only thing this PR needs is a test -- perhaps you can follow the model of
fn rountrip_aggregate() -> Result<()> {
@alamb I have added a test as you suggested |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @adhish20
let schema = Schema::new(vec![field_a, field_b]); | ||
let input = Arc::new(EmptyExec::new(true, Arc::new(schema.clone()))); | ||
|
||
roundtrip_test(Arc::new(AnalyzeExec::new( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❤️
@alamb could you help me by approving the workflow run one more time |
No problem -- after we merge this one, your subsequent PRs should run without the need for explicit approval |
Thanks again @adhish20 -- looking forward to working with you more. |
@alamb me too. |
Which issue does this PR close?
NA
Rationale for this change
Allow serde for AnalyzeExec
What changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?