Skip to content

Conversation

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb commented Jul 19, 2021

Which issue does this PR close?

Re #723

Rationale for this change

Tests are good!

What changes are included in this PR?

Add a end to end test for the config flag added in #749

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Jul 19, 2021

FYI @lvheyang and @houqp

@alamb alamb changed the title Implement test for parquet pruning disabling Test for parquet pruning disabling Jul 19, 2021
.await
.query(query)
.await;
println!("{}", output.description());
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this print needed for the test?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is not needed for the test -- it is included in all of the tests in this module for debugging assistance (when the test fails a log of what is going on also is dumped). I can remove it if you prefer

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cool, just wanted to make sure it's intentional :)

@lvheyang
Copy link
Contributor

This test looks great to me. I would add more test cases in the following PR. Thank you @alamb.

@alamb alamb merged commit c7a5a93 into apache:master Jul 20, 2021
@alamb alamb deleted the alamb/test_paquet_pruning branch October 6, 2022 18:31
unkloud pushed a commit to unkloud/datafusion that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants