Minor: Move PartitionStream to physical_plan
#6756
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
alamb
changed the title
PartitionStream to physical_planPartitionStream to physical_plan
alamb
force-pushed
the
alamb/partition_stream
branch
from
58f20c6
to
1aa07d5
Compare
viirya
approved these changes
Jun 24, 2023
jackwener
approved these changes
Jun 25, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Part of #1754
Rationale for this change
To split out
physical_planit can't depend ondatasource(which is in the datafusion core crate now)What changes are included in this PR?
Move
PartitionStreamto physical_planAre these changes tested?
N/A
Are there any user-facing changes?
In theory, yes, if anyone uses this API, which I think will not be many people as it is fairly new