datafusion-cli: Refactor statement execution logic
#16634
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
liamzwbao
force-pushed
the
issue-16559-refactor-cli-exec
branch
from
f97946b to
a69240c
Compare
alamb
approved these changes
Jul 2, 2025
Contributor
alamb
left a comment
alamb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you very much @liamzwbao ❤️
| for statement in statements { | ||
| let adjusted = | ||
| AdjustedPrintOptions::new(print_options.clone()).with_statement(&statement); | ||
| StatementExecutor::new(statement) |
Contributor
|
Thanks again @liamzwbao -- keeping the code clean 💯 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
datafusion-cli#16559.Rationale for this change
What changes are included in this PR?
Encapsulate s3 region retry logic into StatementExecutor
Are these changes tested?
Already covered by existing tests as this PR is to refactor logic
Are there any user-facing changes?
No