Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add documentation about performance PRs, add (TBD) section on feature criteria #12372

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 9, 2024

Conversation

alamb
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb commented Sep 7, 2024

Which issue does this PR close?

Related to #12357

Rationale for this change

I think there is some "common knowledge" that is not explicitly written down anywhere

Specifically, that performance improvements should be accompanied by benchmark results (most recently this came up in #12270)

What changes are included in this PR?

  1. Document need for benchmarks for performance PRs
  2. Add a section (without content) for the outcome of [DISCUSS] Document criteria for adding new features / what belongs in core DataFusion (e.g. sql syntax, functions, etc) #12357
  3. Some other "drive by" documentation improvements

Note I am not trying to change anything, only document the current reality.

Are these changes tested?

by doc CI

Are there any user-facing changes?

Docs

@alamb alamb added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Sep 7, 2024
@alamb alamb changed the title Minor: Add documentation about performance PRs, add (TBD) section on criteroa Minor: Add documentation about performance PRs, add (TBD) section on feature criteria Sep 7, 2024
2. Is the code clear, and fits the style of the existing codebase?

## Performance Improvements
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the new content


Please ensure any issues you raise contains a rationale and suggested alternative -- it is frustrating to be told "don't do it this way" without any clear reason or alternate provided.

Some things to specifically check:

1. Is the feature or fix covered sufficiently with tests (see `Test Organization` below)?
1. Is the feature or fix covered sufficiently with tests (see the [Testing](testing.md) section)?
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added link (there is actually no Testing Organization section anymore below)

@alamb alamb changed the title Minor: Add documentation about performance PRs, add (TBD) section on feature criteria Add documentation about performance PRs, add (TBD) section on feature criteria Sep 7, 2024
- [System level SQL Benchmarks](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/tree/main/benchmarks)
- Microbenchmarks such as those in [functions/benches](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/tree/main/datafusion/functions/benches)

If there is no suitable existing benchmark, you can create a new one. It helps
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a good point, very often reviewing PRs we have to ask showing the actual performance benefit with existing benches or other performance tests

Copy link
Contributor

@comphead comphead left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, thanks @alamb it looks more clear now

Copy link
Member

@Weijun-H Weijun-H left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks @alamb This change makes the guide more friendly, especially for newcomers.

@comphead comphead merged commit 275fb1b into apache:main Sep 9, 2024
7 checks passed
@alamb alamb deleted the alamb/pr_docs branch September 10, 2024 12:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants