Skip to content

Conversation

@yahoNanJing
Copy link
Contributor

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #1210 .

Rationale for this change

When creating the ParquetExec during deserialization, we should avoid do the projection.

What changes are included in this PR?

Are there any user-facing changes?

@houqp
Copy link
Member

houqp commented Nov 2, 2021

@yahoNanJing could you resolve the conflicts?

@houqp houqp added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 2, 2021
@yahoNanJing
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @houqp, thanks to #1141. It fixed the root cause. We can close this PR.

@yahoNanJing yahoNanJing closed this Nov 3, 2021
unkloud pushed a commit to unkloud/datafusion that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2025
* feat: reenable filtered SMJ Anti join tests

* feat: reenable filtered SMJ Anti join tests

* feat: reenable filtered SMJ Anti join tests

* feat: reenable filtered SMJ Anti join tests

* Add CoalesceBatchesExec around SMJ with join filter

* adding `CoalesceBatches`

* adding `CoalesceBatches`

* adding `CoalesceBatches`

* feat: reenable filtered SMJ Anti join tests

* feat: reenable filtered SMJ Anti join tests

---------

Co-authored-by: Andy Grove <agrove@apache.org>
H0TB0X420 pushed a commit to H0TB0X420/datafusion that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2025
* Update cargo lock file and changelog for release

* Bump version
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug of twice projection when creating ParquetExec during deserialization

3 participants