Skip to content

Conversation

@manuzhang
Copy link
Member

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #2685.

Rationale for this change

What changes are included in this PR?

How are these changes tested?

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 4, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 58.74%. Comparing base (f09f8af) to head (5ae7a9d).
⚠️ Report is 689 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #2686      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     56.12%   58.74%   +2.62%     
- Complexity      976     1477     +501     
============================================
  Files           119      163      +44     
  Lines         11743    13995    +2252     
  Branches       2251     2379     +128     
============================================
+ Hits           6591     8222    +1631     
- Misses         4012     4568     +556     
- Partials       1140     1205      +65     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@coderfender
Copy link
Contributor

coderfender commented Nov 5, 2025

This is awesome ! @manuzhang

Copy link
Contributor

@comphead comphead left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @manuzhang
I feel we need to add some comments in the file itself about its usage

@manuzhang
Copy link
Member Author

@comphead Done! Please take another look.

Copy link
Contributor

@comphead comphead left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @manuzhang
I think we really close, WDYT if we add also spark version and scala version?

@comphead
Copy link
Contributor

FYI @andygrove who is also doing work in parallel in documenting the fuzz routine

Copy link
Contributor

@comphead comphead left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @manuzhang I think it is good to me, leaving merge decision to @andygrove as he's collaborating on fuzz testing docs

Copy link
Member

@andygrove andygrove left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@andygrove andygrove merged commit 8769b9e into apache:main Nov 13, 2025
102 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[CometFuzz] Add script to build and run fuzz testing

6 participants