Fix missing VMware details in zone page

[harikrishna-patnala]

Description

This PR fixes #10730 the missing VMware details in zone page

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• build/CI
• test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[harikrishna-patnala]

@blueorangutan ui

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 15.17%. Comparing base (f13cf59) to head (e615f0a).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               4.19   #10731   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     15.17%   15.17%           
  Complexity    11332    11332           
=========================================
  Files          5415     5415           
  Lines        474893   474893           
  Branches      57920    57920           
=========================================
+ Hits          72046    72050    +4     
+ Misses       394792   394790    -2     
+ Partials       8055     8053    -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	4.28% <ø> (ø)
unittests	15.89% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[harikrishna-patnala]

These changes are already addressed in #10647, so closing this PR

[weizhouapache]

@harikrishna-patnala @DaanHoogland
I suggest to create separate PRs for the issues

[DaanHoogland]

@harikrishna-patnala @DaanHoogland I suggest to create separate PRs for the issues

@weizhouapache #10647 is a revert of a feature that causes several issues, this being just one of them.

[weizhouapache]

@harikrishna-patnala @DaanHoogland I suggest to create separate PRs for the issues

@weizhouapache #10647 is a revert of a feature that causes several issues, this being just one of them.

@DaanHoogland
do you want to revert #9925 (you meant it, right ?)

[weizhouapache]

clear to me now. I agree with closing this PR
thanks @DaanHoogland @harikrishna-patnala

[DaanHoogland]

@harikrishna-patnala @DaanHoogland I suggest to create separate PRs for the issues

@weizhouapache #10647 is a revert of a feature that causes several issues, this being just one of them.

@DaanHoogland do you want to revert #9925 (you meant it, right ?)

yes, it is having too many side effects and needs revisiting.