CloudStack 4.20 UI Unable to add KVM-Host on VXLAN Logic structure - Errors #10679
-
problemOn CloudStack 4.20 with a KVM host, I have my VXLAN 1 on Cloudbr1 that reaches management and SS, We only have cloudbr1 created, No other bridge, and everything is BGP. Then at the UI creating the ZONE I got errors: We have had tryed the following Options: Option 1: No tags Option 2: No Tags, Throws and Error " All required traffic types should be added and with multiple physical networks each traffic type should have a label" Option 3: Going with Option 3: The the system throws exceptions like: At this point libvirt is always up and running. LOGS: Management logs shows: The Agent Logs: 2025-03-28 16:48:42,550 DEBUG [commons.beanutils.ConvertUtils] (main:[]) (logid:) Convert string ',' to class 'java.lang.String' AGENT out : There is nothing there And the agent come up, and immediately goes down!! Tata Y. versionsACS 4.20.0.0 The steps to reproduce the bug
What to do about it?No response |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
Can you try entering guid from libvirt file, actually libvirt is responsible for sending this guid to cloudstack-agent. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@tatay188 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
### On the AGENT side: Not sure if this is just related to Ubuntu systems: there is an error on the management server every time i reload it: DEBUG:root:execute:sudo /usr/sbin/service cloudstack-management stop Obviously there is no such file: Should I create One? ls -al /etc/init.d/ ### On the management side, only when i restart the agent: Apr 03 18:41:23 kvmvcompatl2001 systemd[1]: Starting Uncomplicated firewall... Apr 03 23:30:17 kvmvcompatl2001 systemd[1]: Stopped CloudStack Agent. ### Regarding the VXLAN i found the Cloudstack does not link the Interface Loopback to the VXLAN interface, CLOUDSTACK ALONE DOES NOT ADD THE PARENT Loopback interface: Master interface: brvx-1000 Once I manually Link the parent Loopback interface: Master interface: brvx-1000 Is propagating the routes, and I can reach from the remote VTEP But still the System Vms' Interface name are not populated, should it be populated ? what is the normal status for this? Please let me know. Tata Y. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
it is normal, the public IPs are used by system vms, not guest networks
same on my env