Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CELEBORN-1810] Using Operation description instead of ApiResponse description for RESTful APIs #3038

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

turboFei
Copy link
Member

@turboFei turboFei commented Dec 29, 2024

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Using Operation description instead of ApiResponse description for RESTful APIs.

Why are the changes needed?

Make the API description in correct place.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Before:
image

After:
image

@turboFei turboFei changed the title Api desc Using Operation description instead of ApiResponse description Dec 29, 2024
@turboFei turboFei marked this pull request as draft December 29, 2024 01:25
@turboFei turboFei changed the title Using Operation description instead of ApiResponse description Using Operation description instead of ApiResponse description for RESTful APIs Dec 29, 2024
@turboFei turboFei changed the title Using Operation description instead of ApiResponse description for RESTful APIs [CELEBORN-1477][FOLLOWUP] Using Operation description instead of ApiResponse description for RESTful APIs Dec 29, 2024
@turboFei turboFei changed the title [CELEBORN-1477][FOLLOWUP] Using Operation description instead of ApiResponse description for RESTful APIs [CELEBORN-1810] Using Operation description instead of ApiResponse description for RESTful APIs Dec 29, 2024
@turboFei
Copy link
Member Author

Will change the description for exclude worker after #3023 merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant