Skip to content

Conversation

@liyafan82
Copy link
Contributor

According to the discussion in #5063 (comment), Arrow has a mechanism to make sure the data is stored in little-endian, so there is no need to check byte order.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #5098 into master will increase coverage by 2.2%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5098      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.51%   89.72%    +2.2%     
==========================================
  Files         912      674     -238     
  Lines      139034   100918   -38116     
==========================================
- Hits       121679    90550   -31129     
+ Misses      17003    10368    -6635     
+ Partials      352        0     -352
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
cpp/src/arrow/json/converter.cc 90.05% <0%> (-1.76%) ⬇️
cpp/src/arrow/json/chunked-builder.cc 79.91% <0%> (-1.68%) ⬇️
r/src/recordbatch.cpp
r/R/Table.R
go/arrow/math/uint64_amd64.go
r/src/symbols.cpp
rust/datafusion/src/execution/filter.rs
rust/arrow/src/csv/writer.rs
rust/datafusion/src/bin/main.rs
go/arrow/ipc/file_reader.go
... and 231 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4b971ee...538ce59. Read the comment docs.

@pravindra pravindra closed this in 7478fac Aug 16, 2019
pribor pushed a commit to GlobalWebIndex/arrow that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2025
…fHasher

According to the discussion in apache#5063 (comment), Arrow has a mechanism to make sure the data is stored in little-endian, so there is no need to check byte order.

Closes apache#5098 from liyafan82/fly_0816_order and squashes the following commits:

538ce59 <liyafan82> ARROW-6264  There is no need to consider byte order in ArrowBufHasher

Authored-by: liyafan82 <fan_li_ya@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pindikura Ravindra <ravindra@dremio.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants