-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
ARROW-6208: [Java] Correct byte order before comparing in ByteFunctionHelpers #5063
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the purpose is to compare memory segment in lexicographic order, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes. I added a unittest, please take a look.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@pprudhvi thanks for your effort.
I think we need to address two problems here:
I have a little doubtful about 2). If you have an answer to it, please let me know. Thanks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The following prints 2^24
this means the bytes are assumed to be in little endian format while reading as int. Directly comparing int won't be the same as comparing in lexicographic order
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@pprudhvi Maybe I did not make it clear enough. Let me explain the two points in more detail:
Some machines are big endian while others are little endian. We should check this before reversing the bytes. If the code is running on a big endian machine, there is no need to reverse bytes.
I am not sure if the following two results are always identical when comparing 2 pieces of continuous 8 bytes data:
a) read both data as longs (in big endian order), and compare the long values.
b) read both data as 8 bytes, and compare the 8 bytes in sequence, until the first unmatched bytes are found. If all 8 bytes are matched, we return 0.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the arrow buffers are always encoded in little-endian, and java is always in big-endian. so, I think we don't need to check endianness again.