Skip to content

Conversation

@zanmato1984
Copy link
Contributor

@zanmato1984 zanmato1984 commented Jan 14, 2025

Rationale for this change

See #45254

What changes are included in this PR?

First modify the test case to expose the suspecting bug.

Then the fix in source.

Are these changes tested?

By existing tests.

Are there any user-facing changes?

None.

@zanmato1984
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @pitrou , will you take a look?

constexpr int value_no_match_length_min = 128;
constexpr int value_no_match_length_max = 129;
constexpr int value_match_length = 130;
// The value "DDD..." will be hashed to the partition over 4GB of the hash table.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note this really depends on the hash algorithm which is opaque, but this as well is the best I can do so far.

@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Jan 14, 2025
@zanmato1984 zanmato1984 merged commit ea47172 into apache:main Jan 14, 2025
39 checks passed
@zanmato1984 zanmato1984 removed the awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review label Jan 14, 2025
@zanmato1984 zanmato1984 deleted the fix-45254 branch January 14, 2025 13:40
@conbench-apache-arrow
Copy link

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit ea47172.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 3 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants