GH-44479: [CI][Archery] Add missing Flight integration targets

[kou]

Rationale for this change

Go, Rust -> C++, Java, C# don't exist.

What changes are included in this PR?

Add Go, Rust -> C++, Java, C# pairs.

Are these changes tested?

Yes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

• GitHub Issue: [CI] Flight integration tests don't include non-target implementations as producers #44479

[github-actions]

⚠️ GitHub issue #44479 has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

[kou]

https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/11775797590/job/32796921021?pr=44691#step:10:13686

Integration: Test: Flight: C++ -> C++
Integration: Test: Flight: C++ -> Java
Integration: Test: Flight: C++ -> C#
Integration: Test: Flight: Java -> C++
Integration: Test: Flight: Java -> Java
Integration: Test: Flight: Java -> C#
Integration: Test: Flight: C# -> C++
Integration: Test: Flight: C# -> Java
Integration: Test: Flight: C# -> C#
Integration: Test: Flight: C++ -> Go
Integration: Test: Flight: C++ -> Rust
Integration: Test: Flight: Java -> Go
Integration: Test: Flight: Java -> Rust
Integration: Test: Flight: C# -> Go
Integration: Test: Flight: C# -> Rust
Integration: Test: Flight: Go -> C++
Integration: Test: Flight: Go -> Java
Integration: Test: Flight: Go -> C#
Integration: Test: Flight: Rust -> C++
Integration: Test: Flight: Rust -> Java
Integration: Test: Flight: Rust -> C#

• C++, Java , C# <-> C++, Java, C#: All pairs exist: OK
• C++, Java, C# -> Go, Rust: All pairs exist: OK
• Go, Rust -> C++, Java, C#: All pairs exist: OK
• Go, Rust <-> Go, Rust: No pairs exist: OK

[kou]

+1

[conbench-apache-arrow]

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 3 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 65f498b.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 4 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.