-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
MINOR: Add missing permission to milestone assignment bot #673
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -80,5 +80,9 @@ jobs: | |
if: '! github.event.pull_request.draft' | ||
env: | ||
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} | ||
permissions: | ||
contents: read | ||
issues: write | ||
pull-requests: write | ||
run: | | ||
./.github/workflows/dev_pr_milestone.sh "${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}" ${{ github.event.number }} | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jbonofre Can we use this configuration? Is this still satisfied our policy? https://infra.apache.org/github-actions-policy.html
This is what I asked on Zulip: #java-chat > GitHub Action versions alias @ 💬
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it should not be a problem to write issues/pull-requests.
Do you really need to have
GH_TOKEN
env variable ? Why not directly usingGITHUB_TOKEN
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can rename the env var (it appears
gh
CLI accepts both), but the question is whether putting it in the environment in the first place is acceptable? From the Apache Infra page, it sounds like this is actually not allowed anymore?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's my point (sorry if I wasn't clear): why storing as env variable ?
I discussed with Gavin (from the ASF Infra) to clarify the "triggers" statement on the GitHub Action policy page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because the script is invoking the GitHub CLI to do things, and the GitHub CLI needs a token from an environment variable
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lidavidm let me double check with the Infra again (sorry I forgot).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since pull_request_target runs in the target repository's context with write access to secrets, directly executing a .sh file from a PR poses a security risk. To ensure the script hasn't been tampered with, we must verify its SHA256 checksum before execution to prevent unintended scripts from running and potential malicious attacks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be from the main branch, though, not from the PR. (But I guess would it be clearer/safer to have a separate repo of custom actions for the project that we can use and pin?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oops...we're not executing the checkout operation... please disregard me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I double checked and it looks good to me.