GH-445: [Flight] Add middleware for auth2 bearer tokens #446
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
Looks like this PR was setup before #444 merged; pinging @lidavidm @laurentgo @wgtmac, hope that is appropriate. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
This makes it easier to work with auth2 from the Java client without needing to resort to ClientCookieMiddleware (ie, don't need to force the server to support a non-standard auth scheme). I think it could be highly beneficial for ease-of-use when directly creating a FlightClient, and I would expect that the various FlightSqlClient drivers (ADBC, JDBC) could benefit from supporting it as a configuration option.
What changes are included in this PR?
A new FlightClientMiddleware had been added.
Are these changes tested?
These changes have been manually tested; if more testing is necessary, I'm hoping another contributor can provide it or guide me through a test plan.