Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(csharp/src/Drivers): introduce Interop.FlightSql driver #2214

Open
wants to merge 28 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

davidhcoe
Copy link
Contributor

@davidhcoe davidhcoe commented Oct 2, 2024

  • Introduces the Interop.FlightSql driver to use the FlightSQL Go driver from C#
  • Adds support for testing against multiple FlightSQL environments simultaneously in the configuration (something we may want to carry forward to other projects)
  • Has a first set of test sample data specific to DuckDB and SQLite using https://github.com/voltrondata/SQLFlite as the server(s).
  • Adds support for the IntervalType in a generic capacity

@davidhcoe davidhcoe marked this pull request as draft October 3, 2024 13:58
@davidhcoe davidhcoe marked this pull request as ready for review October 3, 2024 17:47
Copy link
Member

@zeroshade zeroshade left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there any way to make the process of creating something to load the driver and wrap it more generic so that potential future drivers don't require as much boiler plate as this appears to?

Otherwise, this looks pretty fine to me but I'm not very experienced with C#

/// <param name="schemaName"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
public static List<AdbcCatalog> ParseCatalog(RecordBatch recordBatch, string? databaseName, string? schemaName)
public static List<AdbcCatalog> ParseCatalog(RecordBatch recordBatch, string? schemaName)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why remove the databaseName param?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It isn’t used in the method.

Co-authored-by: Matt Topol <zotthewizard@gmail.com>
@davidhcoe
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is there any way to make the process of creating something to load the driver and wrap it more generic so that potential future drivers don't require as much boiler plate as this appears to?

Otherwise, this looks pretty fine to me but I'm not very experienced with C#

Like a base class that https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/blob/7fc08cce7404b000c400e00f208ded6dc80f6bb8/csharp/src/Drivers/Interop/FlightSql/FlightSqlDriverLoader.cs could implement?

@lidavidm
Copy link
Member

I do agree there's some boilerplate that might be good to factor out eventually, if we're going to have multiple packages like this

Copy link
Contributor

@CurtHagenlocher CurtHagenlocher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I have a few small nits and questions.

@@ -10,12 +10,8 @@ Project("{2150E333-8FDC-42A3-9474-1A3956D46DE8}") = "Tests", "Tests", "{5BD04C26
EndProject
Project("{2150E333-8FDC-42A3-9474-1A3956D46DE8}") = "Drivers", "Drivers", "{FEB257A0-4FD3-495E-9A47-9E1649755445}"
EndProject
Project("{9A19103F-16F7-4668-BE54-9A1E7A4F7556}") = "Apache.Arrow.Adbc.Drivers.FlightSql", "src\Drivers\FlightSql\Apache.Arrow.Adbc.Drivers.FlightSql.csproj", "{19AA450A-2F87-49BD-9122-8AD07D4C6DCE}"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't seem to be deleting these projects -- and I think we probably shouldn't -- so why remove them from the solution?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed them so they would no longer be built with the solution and new versions of the NuGet packages wouldn't continue to generate.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But don't you think that someone using .NET 8 would prefer to use these over the interop version?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought it would just cause confusion. My intent was to show the native .NET one hasn't been updated in a while to then deprecate it, but we can keep it for now.

-- limitations under the License.

CREATE OR REPLACE TRANSIENT TABLE {ADBC_CATALOG}.{ADBC_SCHEMA}.{ADBC_TABLE} (
NUMBERTYPE NUMBER(38,0),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: This file has a mix of tab-based and space-based indentation

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I decided to just remove this, since it's based on the wrong types, and we would need different samples for the different Flight SQL environments.

@zeroshade
Copy link
Member

Like a base class that https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/blob/7fc08cce7404b000c400e00f208ded6dc80f6bb8/csharp/src/Drivers/Interop/FlightSql/FlightSqlDriverLoader.cs could implement?

Exactly

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants