Skip to content

Conversation

@o-nikolas
Copy link
Contributor

This mostly entails ensuring that reads from conf are happening on the team aware self.conf created in the base executor, rather than from conf directly. Also adding backcompat support with older versions of the base executor interface


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.

This mostly entails ensuring that reads from conf are happening on the
team aware self.conf created in the base executor, rather than from conf
directly. Also adding backcompat support with older versions of the base
executor interface
@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added the area:Executors-core LocalExecutor & SequentialExecutor label Dec 4, 2025
@o-nikolas o-nikolas changed the title Update LocalExecutor to support running in a multi-team config AIP 67 - Multi-Team: Update LocalExecutor to support running in a multi-team config Dec 4, 2025
@o-nikolas o-nikolas added the multi-team - aip-67 Issues related to multi-team (AIP-67) label Dec 4, 2025
@o-nikolas o-nikolas requested a review from vincbeck December 4, 2025 00:44
@potiuk potiuk merged commit f585481 into apache:main Dec 7, 2025
65 checks passed
amoghrajesh pushed a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2025
…ti-team config (apache#59021)

* Update LocalExecutor to support running in a multi-team config

This mostly entails ensuring that reads from conf are happening on the
team aware self.conf created in the base executor, rather than from conf
directly. Also adding backcompat support with older versions of the base
executor interface

* Remove superfluous file
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:Executors-core LocalExecutor & SequentialExecutor multi-team - aip-67 Issues related to multi-team (AIP-67)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants