Skip to content

Conversation

@jscheffl
Copy link
Contributor

It might not be a good example to have a jinja tempalted parameter in a command line as this smells like the option of a remote injection backdoor. So the current example is not really a good example. Even if the parameter is validated to be only an integer it might lead users to copy&paste and drives a bad pactice of unchecked command code.

Therefore I propose to remove the parameter. Even if it is not a (current) problem but rather to be positive in examples

@jscheffl jscheffl requested a review from potiuk July 31, 2025 20:24
@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added area:providers provider:edge Edge Executor / Worker (AIP-69) / edge3 labels Jul 31, 2025
Copy link
Member

@dheerajturaga dheerajturaga left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense!

@potiuk potiuk merged commit 828fd91 into apache:main Jul 31, 2025
73 checks passed
RoyLee1224 pushed a commit to RoyLee1224/airflow that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2025
ferruzzi pushed a commit to aws-mwaa/upstream-to-airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2025
fweilun pushed a commit to fweilun/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:providers provider:edge Edge Executor / Worker (AIP-69) / edge3

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants