fix: Change DataprocAsyncHook parent class to GoogleBaseAsyncHook

[kgw7401]

Hi I'm making some feature on dataproc trigger but i got an error related to async when i set deferrable=True
Here is error that i encountered.

Related: #52005

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File "/opt/airflow/airflow-core/src/airflow/jobs/triggerer_job_runner.py", line 923, in cleanup_finished_triggers
    result = details["task"].result()
             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  File "/opt/airflow/airflow-core/src/airflow/jobs/triggerer_job_runner.py", line 1032, in run_trigger
    async for event in trigger.run():

  File "/opt/airflow/providers/google/src/airflow/providers/google/cloud/triggers/dataproc.py", line 187, in run
    job = await self.get_async_hook().get_job(
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  File "/opt/airflow/providers/google/src/airflow/providers/google/cloud/triggers/dataproc.py", line 71, in get_async_hook
    return DataprocAsyncHook(
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  File "/opt/airflow/providers/google/src/airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/dataproc.py", line 1286, in __init__
    super().__init__(gcp_conn_id=gcp_conn_id, impersonation_chain=impersonation_chain, **kwargs)

  File "/opt/airflow/providers/google/src/airflow/providers/google/common/hooks/base_google.py", line 280, in __init__
    self.extras: dict = self.get_connection(self.gcp_conn_id).extra_dejson
                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  File "/opt/airflow/airflow-core/src/airflow/hooks/base.py", line 64, in get_connection
    conn = Connection.get_connection_from_secrets(conn_id)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  File "/opt/airflow/airflow-core/src/airflow/models/connection.py", line 481, in get_connection_from_secrets
    conn = TaskSDKConnection.get(conn_id=conn_id)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  File "/opt/airflow/task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/definitions/connection.py", line 152, in get
    return _get_connection(conn_id)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  File "/opt/airflow/task-sdk/src/airflow/sdk/execution_time/context.py", line 155, in _get_connection
    msg = SUPERVISOR_COMMS.send(GetConnection(conn_id=conn_id))
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  File "/opt/airflow/airflow-core/src/airflow/jobs/triggerer_job_runner.py", line 708, in send
    return async_to_sync(self.asend)(msg)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/asgiref/sync.py", line 186, in __call__
    raise RuntimeError(

RuntimeError: You cannot use AsyncToSync in the same thread as an async event loop - just await the async function directly.

I think main reason is that even if i use get_async_hook, inside of DataprocAsyncHook inherit GoogleBaseHook that is not for async. so i change the DataprocAsyncHook's parent class into GoogleBaseAsyncHook.

---

^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.

[kgw7401]

I’m updating the test codes.

[kgw7401]

@RNHTTR Hi there! Could you pls review my pr when you have time?

[RNHTTR]

A couple small nits. Also... should there be a test for get_cluster?

[kgw7401]

@eladkal I got approved. Could you please merge this pr? cause this is related to another issue!

[kyungjunleeme]

@kgw7401 I think that this is nice pr.

but if one morething to be added, it is nice pr more.

in test_dataproc.py

@pytest.fixture
def async_get_operation():
    def func(**kwargs):
        m = mock.MagicMock()
        m.configure_mock(**kwargs)
        f = Future()
        f.set_result(m)
        return f

    return func

it should be removed. because that fixture is not being used in that module.
could you check again?

[potiuk]

it should be removed. because that fixture is not being used in that module.
could you check again?

Could be separate PR.

[potiuk]

We try to focus on one thing only in one PR - this is super important for cherry-picking/reverting / tracking what was changed when