Skip to content

Conversation

@amoghrajesh
Copy link
Contributor

Ok it didn't work for some reason the other day!

Works now:

collecting ... collected 17 items / 3 deselected / 14 selected
run-last-failure: rerun previous 14 failures

unit/telegram/hooks/test_telegram.py::TestTelegramHook::test_should_use_default_connection 
unit/telegram/hooks/test_telegram.py::TestTelegramHook::test_should_raise_exception_if_conn_id_doesnt_contain_token 
unit/telegram/hooks/test_telegram.py::TestTelegramHook::test_should_raise_exception_if_chat_id_is_not_provided_anywhere 
unit/telegram/hooks/test_telegram.py::TestTelegramHook::test_should_raise_exception_if_message_text_is_not_provided 
unit/telegram/hooks/test_telegram.py::TestTelegramHook::test_should_send_message_if_all_parameters_are_correctly_provided 
unit/telegram/hooks/test_telegram.py::TestTelegramHook::test_should_send_message_if_chat_id_is_provided_through_constructor 
unit/telegram/hooks/test_telegram.py::TestTelegramHook::test_should_send_message_if_chat_id_is_provided_in_connection 
unit/telegram/hooks/test_telegram.py::TestTelegramHook::test_should_retry_when_any_telegram_error_is_encountered 
unit/telegram/hooks/test_telegram.py::TestTelegramHook::test_should_raise_exception_if_chat_id_is_not_provided_anywhere_when_sending_file 
unit/telegram/hooks/test_telegram.py::TestTelegramHook::test_should_raise_exception_if_file_path_is_not_provided_when_sending_file 
unit/telegram/hooks/test_telegram.py::TestTelegramHook::test_should_send_file_if_all_parameters_are_correctly_provided 
unit/telegram/hooks/test_telegram.py::TestTelegramHook::test_should_send_file_if_chat_id_is_provided_through_constructor 
unit/telegram/hooks/test_telegram.py::TestTelegramHook::test_should_send_file_if_chat_id_is_provided_in_connection 
unit/telegram/hooks/test_telegram.py::TestTelegramHook::test_should_retry_on_telegram_error_when_sending_file 

================= 14 passed, 3 deselected, 1 warning in 9.88s ==================

^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.

@gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member

have updated this #52028

@amoghrajesh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing my PR in favour of #52069

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants