Fix reading number of dags from direct system providers path #50843
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
@potiuk , we also directly import Can we update it there as well? |
Member
Author
|
Yep. It needs more fixes. will do it tomorrow, I am in |
The original PR apache#49978 that fixed generation of proper documentation for standard provider examples added retrieval of the path by checking import location for the standard provider. Instead we are now using direct path to the provider.
potiuk
force-pushed
the
fix-unit-tests-provider-examples
branch
from
54f6fe0 to
92f5c2a
Compare
eladkal
approved these changes
May 21, 2025
Member
Author
|
OK. That one should work @rawwar -> I will look at teh |
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2025
…ath (#50843) The original PR #49978 that fixed generation of proper documentation for standard provider examples added retrieval of the path by checking import location for the standard provider. Instead we are now using direct path to the provider. (cherry picked from commit 13c6020) Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
Backport successfully created: v3-0-test
|
potiuk
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2025
…ath (#50843) (#50877) The original PR #49978 that fixed generation of proper documentation for standard provider examples added retrieval of the path by checking import location for the standard provider. Instead we are now using direct path to the provider. (cherry picked from commit 13c6020) Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
nailo2c
pushed a commit
to nailo2c/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2025
…50843) The original PR apache#49978 that fixed generation of proper documentation for standard provider examples added retrieval of the path by checking import location for the standard provider. Instead we are now using direct path to the provider.
dadonnelly316
pushed a commit
to dadonnelly316/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2025
…50843) The original PR apache#49978 that fixed generation of proper documentation for standard provider examples added retrieval of the path by checking import location for the standard provider. Instead we are now using direct path to the provider.
kaxil
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2025
…ath (#50843) (#50877) The original PR #49978 that fixed generation of proper documentation for standard provider examples added retrieval of the path by checking import location for the standard provider. Instead we are now using direct path to the provider. (cherry picked from commit 13c6020) Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
sanederchik
pushed a commit
to sanederchik/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2025
…50843) The original PR apache#49978 that fixed generation of proper documentation for standard provider examples added retrieval of the path by checking import location for the standard provider. Instead we are now using direct path to the provider.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The original PR #49978 that fixed generation of proper documentation for standard provider examples added retrieval of the path by checking import location for the standard provider. Instead we are now using direct path to the provider.
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.