Skip to content

Conversation

@dstandish
Copy link
Contributor

Making dag required helps me in #50040. It's always passed in all production code so, we can make the change. Should be thought of as private anyway. And making it kwarg only, well why not.

Making dag required helps me in apache#50040.  It's always passed in all production code so, we can make the change.  Should be thought of as private anyway.  And making it kwarg only, well why not.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With dag being required, we should also get rid of the DagBag inside the function. This should speed things up quite a bit.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 for that, looks good to me otherwise

@dstandish dstandish closed this May 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants