Skip to content

Conversation

@jedcunningham
Copy link
Member

It's possible that the start/end date are null when processing an executor event, and there is no point in adding an OTEL event in that case.

Before this, we'd try and convert None to nanoseconds and blow up the scheduler.

Note: I don't think queued_dttm can be empty, but figured it didn't hurt to guard against it just in case I've overlooked a way it can be possible.

(cherry picked from commit fe41e15)

Backporting #43558

…#43558)

It's possible that the start/end date are null when processing an
executor event, and there is no point in adding an OTEL event in that
case.

Before this, we'd try and convert `None` to nanoseconds and blow up the
scheduler.

Note: I don't think `queued_dttm` can be empty, but figured it didn't hurt to
guard against it just in case I've overlooked a way it can be possible.

(cherry picked from commit fe41e15)
@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added the area:Scheduler including HA (high availability) scheduler label Oct 31, 2024
@potiuk potiuk merged commit c83e524 into apache:v2-10-test Oct 31, 2024
@utkarsharma2 utkarsharma2 added the type:bug-fix Changelog: Bug Fixes label Nov 1, 2024
@utkarsharma2 utkarsharma2 added this to the Airflow 2.10.3 milestone Nov 1, 2024
utkarsharma2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2024
#43567)

It's possible that the start/end date are null when processing an
executor event, and there is no point in adding an OTEL event in that
case.

Before this, we'd try and convert `None` to nanoseconds and blow up the
scheduler.

Note: I don't think `queued_dttm` can be empty, but figured it didn't hurt to
guard against it just in case I've overlooked a way it can be possible.

(cherry picked from commit fe41e15)
(cherry picked from commit c83e524)
utkarsharma2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2024
#43567)

It's possible that the start/end date are null when processing an
executor event, and there is no point in adding an OTEL event in that
case.

Before this, we'd try and convert `None` to nanoseconds and blow up the
scheduler.

Note: I don't think `queued_dttm` can be empty, but figured it didn't hurt to
guard against it just in case I've overlooked a way it can be possible.

(cherry picked from commit fe41e15)
(cherry picked from commit c83e524)
utkarsharma2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2024
#43567)

It's possible that the start/end date are null when processing an
executor event, and there is no point in adding an OTEL event in that
case.

Before this, we'd try and convert `None` to nanoseconds and blow up the
scheduler.

Note: I don't think `queued_dttm` can be empty, but figured it didn't hurt to
guard against it just in case I've overlooked a way it can be possible.

(cherry picked from commit fe41e15)
(cherry picked from commit c83e524)
utkarsharma2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2024
#43567)

It's possible that the start/end date are null when processing an
executor event, and there is no point in adding an OTEL event in that
case.

Before this, we'd try and convert `None` to nanoseconds and blow up the
scheduler.

Note: I don't think `queued_dttm` can be empty, but figured it didn't hurt to
guard against it just in case I've overlooked a way it can be possible.

(cherry picked from commit fe41e15)
(cherry picked from commit c83e524)
@jedcunningham jedcunningham deleted the backport_otel_fix branch November 1, 2024 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:Scheduler including HA (high availability) scheduler type:bug-fix Changelog: Bug Fixes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants