Skip to content

Conversation

@vincbeck
Copy link
Contributor

@vincbeck vincbeck commented Oct 9, 2024


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@vincbeck vincbeck added the legacy api Whether legacy API changes should be allowed in PR label Oct 9, 2024
@vincbeck vincbeck closed this Oct 9, 2024
@vincbeck vincbeck reopened this Oct 9, 2024
@vincbeck vincbeck force-pushed the vincbeck/fab_schemas branch 5 times, most recently from 602c5be to 5745f77 Compare October 9, 2024 20:07
@vincbeck vincbeck force-pushed the vincbeck/fab_schemas branch from 5745f77 to 778adaf Compare October 9, 2024 20:30
@pierrejeambrun
Copy link
Member

This is targeted for airflow 3 right ? Because I was wondering how core would now depend on latest FAB provider release otherwise.

@vincbeck
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is targeted for airflow 3 right ? Because I was wondering how core would now depend on latest FAB provider release otherwise.

True and these fails are not used in core Airflow anyway. This is something I missed when working on AIP-56,these files should have been moved back then

@vincbeck vincbeck merged commit c7104f5 into apache:main Oct 10, 2024
@vincbeck vincbeck deleted the vincbeck/fab_schemas branch October 10, 2024 13:08
kunaljubce pushed a commit to kunaljubce/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2024
pavansharma36 pushed a commit to pavansharma36/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2024
R7L208 pushed a commit to R7L208/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
harjeevanmaan pushed a commit to harjeevanmaan/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
PaulKobow7536 pushed a commit to PaulKobow7536/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2024
ellisms pushed a commit to ellisms/airflow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:providers legacy api Whether legacy API changes should be allowed in PR provider:fab

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants