Skip to content

Conversation

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented Jul 28, 2024

The twisted/incremental#106 issue has been addressed in 24.7.2 so we are removing the limit - just in case we also exclude the buggy versions, even if they are yanked.


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@potiuk potiuk added the full tests needed We need to run full set of tests for this PR to merge label Jul 28, 2024
@hussein-awala
Copy link
Member

just in case we also exclude the buggy versions, even if they are yanked.

Is there any reason for that? yanking should be safe without the need to exclude the versions if I am not mistaken 🤔

@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Jul 28, 2024

just in case we also exclude the buggy versions, even if they are yanked.

Is there any reason for that? yanking should be safe without the need to exclude the versions if I am not mistaken 🤔

Yeah. It is, but ... well they could be unyanked :D

@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the check-incremental branch from e0716d4 to e06cf32 Compare July 30, 2024 08:45
@potiuk potiuk marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2024 08:45
@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Jul 30, 2024

The https://pypi.org/project/incremental/24.7.2/ released - 24.7.1 not yanked yet, so I prefer to keep the exclusions @hussein-awala

@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Jul 30, 2024

Would love to merge it :)

The twisted/incremental#106 issue has
been addressed in 24.7.2 so we are removing the limit - just in
case we also exclude the buggy versions, even if they are yanked.
@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the check-incremental branch from e06cf32 to db47bc8 Compare July 30, 2024 20:02
@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Jul 31, 2024

Yeah as discussed with the author in twisted/incremental#106 (comment) they might not want to yank this version - so it's good for us to exclude them

@eladkal eladkal added this to the Airflow 2.10.0 milestone Jul 31, 2024
@potiuk potiuk merged commit 16be0e8 into apache:main Jul 31, 2024
@potiuk potiuk deleted the check-incremental branch July 31, 2024 08:53
bjankie1 pushed a commit to bjankie1/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2024
The twisted/incremental#106 issue has
been addressed in 24.7.2 so we are removing the limit - just in
case we also exclude the buggy versions, even if they are yanked.
bjankie1 pushed a commit to bjankie1/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2024
The twisted/incremental#106 issue has
been addressed in 24.7.2 so we are removing the limit - just in
case we also exclude the buggy versions, even if they are yanked.
bjankie1 pushed a commit to bjankie1/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2024
The twisted/incremental#106 issue has
been addressed in 24.7.2 so we are removing the limit - just in
case we also exclude the buggy versions, even if they are yanked.
molcay pushed a commit to VladaZakharova/airflow that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2024
The twisted/incremental#106 issue has
been addressed in 24.7.2 so we are removing the limit - just in
case we also exclude the buggy versions, even if they are yanked.
molcay pushed a commit to VladaZakharova/airflow that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2024
The twisted/incremental#106 issue has
been addressed in 24.7.2 so we are removing the limit - just in
case we also exclude the buggy versions, even if they are yanked.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

full tests needed We need to run full set of tests for this PR to merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants