Skip to content

Conversation

@Lee-W
Copy link
Member

@Lee-W Lee-W commented May 27, 2024


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added area:providers provider:cncf-kubernetes Kubernetes (k8s) provider related issues labels May 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@dirrao dirrao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Lee-W Lee-W force-pushed the fix-k8s-client-unexpected-argument branch from 54379e5 to 8e8e802 Compare May 27, 2024 23:30
@Lee-W Lee-W merged commit e190cff into apache:main May 28, 2024
@Lee-W Lee-W deleted the fix-k8s-client-unexpected-argument branch May 28, 2024 01:10
fdemiane pushed a commit to fdemiane/airflow that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2024
* fix(providers/cncf)
    * remove unexpected argument pod in read_namespaced_pod_log call
    * change wrong argument container_name to container for read_namespaced_pod_log
romsharon98 pushed a commit to romsharon98/airflow that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2024
* fix(providers/cncf)
    * remove unexpected argument pod in read_namespaced_pod_log call
    * change wrong argument container_name to container for read_namespaced_pod_log
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:providers provider:cncf-kubernetes Kubernetes (k8s) provider related issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants