Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Additional type-ignore after types-docutils #37859

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 3, 2024

Conversation

potiuk
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented Mar 3, 2024

Turns out we also need to ignore index error on the type returned from docutils - because it's not a specific type but Any.


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

Turns out we also need to ignore index error on the type returned
from docutils - because it's not a specific type but Any.
@potiuk potiuk merged commit ab21a6c into apache:main Mar 3, 2024
56 checks passed
@potiuk potiuk deleted the additional-type-ignore branch March 3, 2024 07:26
abhishekbhakat pushed a commit to abhishekbhakat/my_airflow that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2024
Turns out we also need to ignore index error on the type returned
from docutils - because it's not a specific type but Any.
ephraimbuddy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2024
Turns out we also need to ignore index error on the type returned
from docutils - because it's not a specific type but Any.

(cherry picked from commit ab21a6c)
utkarsharma2 pushed a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2024
Turns out we also need to ignore index error on the type returned
from docutils - because it's not a specific type but Any.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants