Skip to content

Conversation

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented Jan 30, 2023

The description mentioned SQS which is not currently officially supported as broker. However this config could be used in case of (potentially) any broker that does not support remote control.

In order to not make false impression that SQS is supported, we should remove the specific reference.


^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

The description mentioned SQS which is not currently officially
supported as broker. However this config could be used in case
of (potentially) any broker that does not support remote control.

In order to not make false impression that SQS is supported, we
should remove the specific reference.
@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the clarify-config-description-for-remote-control branch from 9a4f8ce to bbec953 Compare January 30, 2023 20:10
@jedcunningham jedcunningham merged commit 5a1dc9e into apache:main Jan 30, 2023
@jedcunningham jedcunningham added this to the Airflow 2.5.2 milestone Jan 30, 2023
@pierrejeambrun pierrejeambrun added the type:misc/internal Changelog: Misc changes that should appear in change log label Feb 27, 2023
pierrejeambrun pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2023
The description mentioned SQS which is not currently officially
supported as broker. However this config could be used in case
of (potentially) any broker that does not support remote control.

In order to not make false impression that SQS is supported, we
should remove the specific reference.

(cherry picked from commit 5a1dc9e)
pierrejeambrun pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2023
The description mentioned SQS which is not currently officially
supported as broker. However this config could be used in case
of (potentially) any broker that does not support remote control.

In order to not make false impression that SQS is supported, we
should remove the specific reference.

(cherry picked from commit 5a1dc9e)
@potiuk potiuk deleted the clarify-config-description-for-remote-control branch March 22, 2023 18:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type:misc/internal Changelog: Misc changes that should appear in change log

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants