Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hdfs provider: fix HA support for webhdfs #19711

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 24, 2021
Merged

Conversation

Aakcht
Copy link
Contributor

@Aakcht Aakcht commented Nov 19, 2021

HA support for webHDFS was actually added in #7454 , but stopped working when conn_id became unique in #8608 . This PR fixes it by allowing to specify more than one host for webhdfs connection via ,.


^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code change, Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in UPDATING.md.

@Aakcht
Copy link
Contributor Author

Aakcht commented Nov 23, 2021

If needed, I can add a new test specifically for HA case, but I think it should be enough that I've modified one of the old ones for multiple hosts.

@Aakcht Aakcht force-pushed the webhdfs_ha branch 2 times, most recently from e041104 to 2ada5a6 Compare November 23, 2021 18:32
@github-actions
Copy link

The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because it does not modify the core of Airflow. If the committers decide that the full tests matrix is needed, they will add the label 'full tests needed'. Then you should rebase to the latest main or amend the last commit of the PR, and push it with --force-with-lease.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests label Nov 23, 2021
@Aakcht
Copy link
Contributor Author

Aakcht commented Nov 23, 2021

I've made the suggested changes and all the checks are now passing 😄 Please tell me if anything else is needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:providers kind:documentation okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants