Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing License details for Connexion #15906

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2021

Conversation

kaxil
Copy link
Member

@kaxil kaxil commented May 18, 2021

This was missed in #15781

Since "connexion" is Apache licensed, this is "not a blocker" for 2.1.0 as mentioned in https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#license-file

When a package bundles code under several licenses, the LICENSE file MUST contain details of all these licenses. For each component which is not Apache licensed, details of the component MUST be appended to the LICENSE file. The component license itself MUST either be appended or else stored elsewhere in the package with a pointer to it from the LICENSE file, e.g. if the license is long.

As "connexton" is Apache 2 Licensed, this might be OK.


^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code change, Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in UPDATING.md.

This was missed in apache#15781

Since "connexion" is Apache licensed, this is "not a blocker" for 2.1.0 as mentioned in https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#license-file

>When a package bundles code under several licenses, the LICENSE file MUST contain details of all these licenses. For each component which is not Apache licensed, details of the component MUST be appended to the LICENSE file. The component license itself MUST either be appended or else stored elsewhere in the package with a pointer to it from the LICENSE file, e.g. if the license is long.

As "connextion" is Apache 2 Licensed, this _might_ be OK.
@kaxil kaxil requested a review from ashb May 18, 2021 00:44
@potiuk potiuk merged commit 180df03 into apache:master May 18, 2021
@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented May 18, 2021

Ah, missed. that while adding licence-connexion.txt:( . Thanks @kaxil for dilligence!

@ashb ashb deleted the missing-connexion branch May 18, 2021 08:55
ashb pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2021
This was missed in #15781

Since "connexion" is Apache licensed, this is "not a blocker" for 2.1.0 as mentioned in https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#license-file

>When a package bundles code under several licenses, the LICENSE file MUST contain details of all these licenses. For each component which is not Apache licensed, details of the component MUST be appended to the LICENSE file. The component license itself MUST either be appended or else stored elsewhere in the package with a pointer to it from the LICENSE file, e.g. if the license is long.

As "connextion" is Apache 2 Licensed, this _might_ be OK.

(cherry picked from commit 180df03)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants