Skip to content

Conversation

@wxyucs
Copy link
Collaborator

@wxyucs wxyucs commented Nov 11, 2025

Summary by Sourcery

Introduce a GitHub Actions workflow to automatically synchronize the docs directory to the GitHub Pages repository upon changes

CI:

  • Add ‘Sync Docs to Pages Repo’ workflow triggered on docs/** updates
  • Checkout both source and pages repositories and sync docs via rsync
  • Commit and force push synced docs to the pages repo’s sync branch

@wxyucs wxyucs self-assigned this Nov 11, 2025
@wxyucs wxyucs requested a review from jiaweizone as a code owner November 11, 2025 11:36
@wxyucs wxyucs added the kind/documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Nov 11, 2025
@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Nov 11, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

This PR reorganizes the docs directory for clearer structure and adds a GitHub Actions workflow to automatically sync documentation changes to the vsag-io pages repository.

Flow diagram for docs sync process in GitHub Actions

flowchart TD
  A["Push to main branch affecting docs/"] --> B["Trigger GitHub Actions workflow"]
  B --> C["Checkout VSAG repo"]
  B --> D["Checkout vsag-io.github.io repo"]
  C --> E["Sync docs directory via rsync"]
  D --> E
  E --> F["Commit and push changes to vsag-io.github.io"]
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Refactor documentation directory structure for improved organization
  • Reorganized markdown files into topic-specific subdirectories
  • Updated sidebar configuration to reference new file paths
  • Adjusted internal links to match refactored layout
docs/
Add GitHub Action to sync docs to pages repository
  • Created workflow triggered on main branch changes under docs/**
  • Checked out both source and target repositories in the action
  • Used rsync for one-way sync and conditional commit/push logic
.github/workflows/docs.yaml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @wxyucs, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving the organization of the project's documentation by restructuring the docs/ directory. This change aims to create a clearer, more maintainable structure for documentation, particularly for blog posts, and lays the groundwork for automated synchronization processes.

Highlights

  • Documentation Structure Refactor: The docs/ directory has been refactored, specifically moving blog-related content into a new docs/blog/zh/ subdirectory for better organization and future expansion.
  • GitHub Action for Docs Sync: A new GitHub Action is intended to be added to synchronize documentation, as indicated by the PR title, though its implementation details are not visible in the provided diffs.
Ignored Files
  • Ignored by pattern: .github/workflows/** (1)
    • .github/workflows/docs.yaml
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey there - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

  • The directory names are inconsistent: you check out the pages repo to repo-vsagio but later cd repo-VSAGIO, so the script will fail—please unify the directory casing.
  • Instead of requiring a separate GH_PAT secret, you can use the built-in GITHUB_TOKEN with appropriate permissions to simplify authentication.
  • Verify that pushing to the sync branch is correctly aligned with your GitHub Pages setup—typically you’d push to a gh-pages or main branch depending on your Pages configuration.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- The directory names are inconsistent: you check out the pages repo to `repo-vsagio` but later `cd repo-VSAGIO`, so the script will fail—please unify the directory casing.
- Instead of requiring a separate GH_PAT secret, you can use the built-in GITHUB_TOKEN with appropriate permissions to simplify authentication.
- Verify that pushing to the `sync` branch is correctly aligned with your GitHub Pages setup—typically you’d push to a `gh-pages` or `main` branch depending on your Pages configuration.

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location> `.github/workflows/docs.yaml:33` </location>
<code_context>
+
+      - name: Commit and Push to Repo VSAGIO
+        run: |
+          cd repo-VSAGIO
+          git config user.name "github-actions[bot]"
+          git config user.email "github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com"
</code_context>

<issue_to_address>
**issue (bug_risk):** Directory name casing is inconsistent with earlier steps.

The script uses 'cd repo-VSAGIO', while the earlier step uses 'repo-vsagio'. This inconsistency may cause failures if the directory name does not match. Please standardize the casing.
</issue_to_address>

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.


- name: Commit and Push to Repo VSAGIO
run: |
cd repo-VSAGIO
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

issue (bug_risk): Directory name casing is inconsistent with earlier steps.

The script uses 'cd repo-VSAGIO', while the earlier step uses 'repo-vsagio'. This inconsistency may cause failures if the directory name does not match. Please standardize the casing.

@mergify mergify bot added the module/docs label Nov 11, 2025
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request refactors the documentation directory by moving a blog post. According to the title, it also adds a GitHub Action to sync documentation, but this file was not included in the provided changes for review. My review focuses on the content of the moved blog post, rabitq_intro_zh.md.

I've identified several issues in the blog post:

  • A critical error in a C++ code snippet that results in invalid JSON.
  • An incorrect memory compression ratio for sq8 in a performance comparison table.
  • All URLs in the reference section are broken due to an invisible trailing character.
  • A minor markdown formatting inconsistency in a table.

I've provided specific comments and suggestions to address these points. Please also ensure the new GitHub Action file is included in the pull request if it's intended to be part of these changes.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 11, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1333      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.68%   91.57%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         320      320              
  Lines       17857    17874      +17     
==========================================
- Hits        16373    16369       -4     
- Misses       1484     1505      +21     
Flag Coverage Δ
cpp 91.57% <ø> (-0.11%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
common 89.53% <ø> (ø)
datacell 92.81% <ø> (-0.30%) ⬇️
index 90.63% <ø> (-0.14%) ⬇️
simd 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e9724f8...81a4337. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@wxyucs wxyucs force-pushed the sync-docs branch 4 times, most recently from ad634fe to d0a4468 Compare November 13, 2025 07:01
Signed-off-by: Xiangyu Wang <wxy407827@antgroup.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiangyu Wang <wxy407827@antgroup.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

kind/documentation Improvements or additions to documentation module/docs size/XL version/0.18

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants