chore: move rc-util to @rc-componet/util and move classnames to clsx #237
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough本次 PR 将项目中对 Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 分钟 需要额外注意的点：
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (7)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @yoyo837, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request primarily focuses on a dependency migration, transitioning from the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #237 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.63% 94.63% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 32 32
Lines 2815 2813 -2
Branches 445 445
==========================================
- Hits 2664 2662 -2
Misses 151 151 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly migrates the dependency from rc-util to @rc-component/util. The changes primarily involve updating import statements across the codebase and modifying package.json. Additionally, several files have received minor formatting improvements, such as consistent spacing and line breaks, which enhance code readability. The changes are straightforward and well-executed. By the way, there seems to be a small typo in the pull request title ('componet' instead of 'component').
|
Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
package.json(1 hunks)src/StyleContext.tsx(1 hunks)src/hooks/useCSSVarRegister.ts(2 hunks)src/hooks/useCacheToken.tsx(3 hunks)src/hooks/useEffectCleanupRegister.ts(1 hunks)src/hooks/useStyleRegister.tsx(2 hunks)src/linters/utils.ts(1 hunks)src/theme/Theme.ts(1 hunks)src/util/cacheMapUtil.ts(1 hunks)src/util/index.ts(1 hunks)tests/linter.spec.tsx(17 hunks)tests/server.spec.tsx(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
tests/server.spec.tsx (3)
src/hooks/useStyleRegister.tsx (1)
useStyleRegister(373-518)src/extractStyle.ts (1)
extractStyle(32-111)src/StyleContext.tsx (1)
StyleProvider(100-139)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Socket Security: Pull Request Alerts
- GitHub Check: preview
🔇 Additional comments (19)
src/theme/Theme.ts (1)
1-1: 导入路径更新正确导入路径已成功从
rc-util迁移到@rc-component/util，与 PR 的整体目标一致。src/StyleContext.tsx (1)
1-2: 导入路径迁移正确
useMemo和isEqual的导入路径已正确更新至@rc-component/util。src/hooks/useCacheToken.tsx (3)
2-2: 导入路径更新正确
updateCSS的导入路径已正确迁移至@rc-component/util。
99-99: 格式改进添加分号提高了代码风格的一致性。
255-255: 注释已同步更新注释已正确更新以反映新的依赖包名称。
src/util/cacheMapUtil.ts (1)
1-1: 导入路径更新正确
canUseDom的导入路径已成功迁移至@rc-component/util。src/linters/utils.ts (1)
1-1: 导入路径更新正确
warning工具函数的导入路径已正确更新至@rc-component/util。src/hooks/useEffectCleanupRegister.ts (1)
1-3: 导入路径更新正确
warning的导入路径已正确迁移至@rc-component/util，导入顺序的调整也符合规范。src/util/index.ts (1)
2-5: 导入路径迁移完成所有 DOM 工具函数（
canUseDom、removeCSS、updateCSS）的导入路径已正确更新至@rc-component/util。导入顺序的调整也保持了良好的代码组织。package.json (1)
48-48: 确认依赖包版本和安全性，API 兼容性需手动验证已验证 @rc-component/util 的最新版本为 1.4.0，并且无已知的安全漏洞。
但是，从
rc-util迁移至@rc-component/util时，建议：
- 虽然两个包提供相同的 API 文档示例，但未找到官方迁移指南或 breaking changes 说明
- 需要手动验证代码中所有对旧包的导入是否已正确更新为新包
- 在合并前运行完整的测试套件确保功能完整性
tests/server.spec.tsx (3)
39-43: LGTM！mock 路径更新正确Mock 模块路径已正确从
rc-util/lib/Dom/canUseDom更新为@rc-component/util/lib/Dom/canUseDom，与依赖迁移保持一致。
93-95: 代码格式调整
useStyleRegister调用的格式调整为多行，提高了可读性。
450-464: extractStyle 参数格式优化参数对象格式调整为多行展开，使代码更易读。
src/hooks/useCSSVarRegister.ts (1)
104-104: 注释更新保持一致注释已同步更新为
@rc-component/util，与新的导入路径保持一致。src/hooks/useStyleRegister.tsx (2)
2-2: dynamicCSS 工具导入路径迁移
removeCSS和updateCSS的导入路径已正确从rc-util更新为@rc-component/util。
537-537: 注释同步更新注释已更新为
@rc-component/util，保持代码文档的准确性。tests/linter.spec.tsx (3)
1-1: warning 工具导入路径更新
resetWarned的导入路径已正确从rc-util/lib/warning迁移至@rc-component/util/lib/warning。
35-35: mock 实现简化
console.error的 mock 实现改用更简洁的箭头函数形式，功能等效。
71-73: 测试代码格式统一优化多处
useCacheToken调用的参数对象格式调整为多行展开，提高了测试代码的可读性和一致性。Also applies to: 95-95, 102-107, 118-123, 141-143, 166-168, 197-199, 224-226, 241-243, 262-264, 295-297, 323-325, 355-357, 391-393, 421-423, 453-455
yoyo837
changed the title
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.