Add compressibility quantity

[tmilnthorp]

Closes #1032

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1037 (1fb9f26) into master (53c9784) will decrease coverage by 0.1%.
The diff coverage is 80.8%.

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #1037     +/-   ##
========================================
- Coverage    82.7%   82.6%   -0.0%     
========================================
  Files         308     310      +2     
  Lines       47569   47922    +353     
========================================
+ Hits        39293   39578    +285     
- Misses       8276    8344     +68     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
UnitsNet/GeneratedCode/Quantity.g.cs	66.9% <66.7%> (-<0.1%)	⬇️
...sNet/GeneratedCode/Quantities/Compressibility.g.cs	80.6% <80.6%> (ø)
...neratedCode/NumberToCompressibilityExtensions.g.cs	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 53c9784...1fb9f26. Read the comment docs.

[angularsen]

Found a minor typo, other than that you can go ahead and merge this

[angularsen]

Are you sure it's plural pounds in InversePoundsForceInches?
In Torque, we used PoundForceInches.
https://github.com/angularsen/UnitsNet/blob/master/Common/UnitDefinitions/Torque.json#L67-L79

I see both forms used, but I seem to find more singular form than plural form.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_(force)

[tmilnthorp]

Are you sure it's plural pounds in InversePoundsForceInches? In Torque, we used PoundForceInches. https://github.com/angularsen/UnitsNet/blob/master/Common/UnitDefinitions/Torque.json#L67-L79

I see both forms used, but I seem to find more singular form than plural form. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_(force)

This is more associated with Pressure than Torque. That said, I'd love for @sveipa to clarify

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[sveipa]

Are you sure it's plural pounds in InversePoundsForceInches? In Torque, we used PoundForceInches. https://github.com/angularsen/UnitsNet/blob/master/Common/UnitDefinitions/Torque.json#L67-L79
I see both forms used, but I seem to find more singular form than plural form. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_(force)

This is more associated with Pressure than Torque. That said, I'd love for @sveipa to clarify

I've run the singular vs plural case internally here without being able to conclude what's the right naming convention unfortunately. Sorry for not being able to help on this matter.

[angularsen]

If there is no clear cut convention, I vote we use singular form InversePoundForceInches since it is consistent with PoundForceInches. I don't have strong feelings either way, but I prefer consistency.

[sveipa]

Can this PR be merged please? :-)

[angularsen]

I checked the code base and we have 40/60 mix of PoundForce vs PoundsForce, so I guess there is no consistency to begin with. Keeping it PoundsForce then.

[angularsen]

Sorry for the slow turnaround @sveipa @tmilnthorp , nuget is on the way out.

Release UnitsNet/4.129.0 · angularsen/UnitsNet

[sveipa]

Great, thanks @angularsen :-)