Skip to content

Conversation

@capcom6
Copy link
Member

@capcom6 capcom6 commented Mar 2, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated webhook endpoint URLs by removing an extra path segment, streamlining API integration.
  • Chores
    • Refreshed an underlying dependency to enhance overall performance and reliability.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 2, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request includes two independent changes. First, it updates the dependency version of github.com/android-sms-gateway/client-go in the go.mod file from v1.5.3 to v1.5.4. Second, it modifies the API endpoint URLs in pkg/swagger/docs/requests.http by removing the /api prefix from the GET, POST, and DELETE webhook routes.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
go.mod Updated dependency version for github.com/android-sms-gateway/client-go from v1.5.3 to v1.5.4.
pkg/swagger/docs/requests.http Removed the /api prefix from GET, POST, and DELETE webhook endpoint URLs, aligning the URL structure to a new format.

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b02d486 and 526492c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • go.mod (1 hunks)
  • pkg/swagger/docs/requests.http (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • go.mod
  • pkg/swagger/docs/requests.http
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Build / Docker image (linux/amd64)
  • GitHub Check: Build / Docker image (linux/arm64)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e745c4e and 43ebae6.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • go.mod (1 hunks)
  • pkg/swagger/docs/requests.http (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
  • GitHub Check: E2E
  • GitHub Check: lint
🔇 Additional comments (1)
go.mod (1)

7-7:

✅ Verification successful

Update to client-go package version for webhook validation improvements

This change updates the github.com/android-sms-gateway/client-go dependency from a stable release version (v1.5.3) to a pseudo-version (v1.5.4-0.20250302231821-fae08f7208df). This corresponds to the PR objective of enhancing webhook request validation.

To better understand what specific webhook validation enhancements this version brings, you may want to check the release notes or commit history.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify if the client-go repository has this specific commit available
gh repo view github.com/android-sms-gateway/client-go --json url -q .url > /dev/null 2>&1
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
  echo "Repository exists, checking commit..."
  gh api repos/android-sms-gateway/client-go/commits/fae08f7208df --silent > /dev/null 2>&1
  if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
    echo "Commit exists in the repository!"
  else
    echo "Warning: Commit 'fae08f7208df' not found in the repository."
  fi
else
  echo "Warning: Repository not found or not accessible."
fi

Length of output: 345


Verified: Client-go Dependency Update Confirmed

The executed script confirms that the commit fae08f7208df exists in the github.com/android-sms-gateway/client-go repository, validating the update from v1.5.3 to the pseudo-version v1.5.4-0.20250302231821-fae08f7208df. This update aligns with the PR objective to enhance webhook request validation. For additional context on the improvements, please review the release notes or commit history.


###
GET {{baseUrl}}/api/3rdparty/v1/webhooks HTTP/1.1
GET {{baseUrl}}/3rdparty/v1/webhooks HTTP/1.1
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Updated webhook API routes by removing /api prefix

These changes align with the client-go dependency update by modifying the webhook endpoints to remove the /api prefix. This is consistent with the PR objective to enhance webhook request validation.

Is this change applied consistently to all webhook endpoints? I notice that some other API routes in the file still retain the /api prefix (lines 48, 67, 101). Let's check if this pattern is intentional:

Also applies to: 86-86, 97-97


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistency of API endpoint patterns in the codebase
echo "Checking API endpoint patterns..."
echo "Routes with '/api/3rdparty/v1/webhooks' pattern:"
rg "/api/3rdparty/v1/webhooks" --type go

echo -e "\nRoutes with '/3rdparty/v1/webhooks' pattern (new format):"
rg "/3rdparty/v1/webhooks" --type go --no-filename | grep -v "/api/3rdparty/v1/webhooks"

Length of output: 586


Inconsistent API Route Prefixes in HTTP Docs

  • The Go annotations have been updated correctly to use the /3rdparty/v1/webhooks format (no /api prefix), as confirmed by our search.
  • However, in pkg/swagger/docs/requests.http, some endpoints (lines 48, 67, and 101) still reference the /api prefix.
  • Please update these lines in the HTTP docs to remove the /api prefix so that all webhook endpoints are consistent with the changes made in the Go code.

@capcom6 capcom6 force-pushed the deps/upgrade-client-go branch from 7b6730d to b02d486 Compare March 4, 2025 12:37
@capcom6 capcom6 force-pushed the deps/upgrade-client-go branch from b02d486 to 526492c Compare March 4, 2025 23:03
@capcom6 capcom6 marked this pull request as ready for review March 5, 2025 09:19
@capcom6 capcom6 merged commit 09eb17e into master Mar 6, 2025
9 checks passed
@capcom6 capcom6 deleted the deps/upgrade-client-go branch March 6, 2025 01:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants