Skip to content

Created auto-scaling group within tutorial #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Created auto-scaling group within tutorial #2

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

phillip-pace
Copy link
Contributor

Added auto-scaling group page within tutorial section.

$ fleet env autoscaling limits prod 4 10
```

There are resources limits in place on your Fleet account for the total number of instances yo ucan run. At any point you see for yourself how many instances you are running and what the current max amount is set to by running:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typo 'yo ucan' -> 'you can'

@privatesmith
Copy link
Contributor

Also, make sure .DS_Store isn't included.

@privatesmith privatesmith self-assigned this Jul 31, 2015

## Desired

You have the option rather than waiting for your infrastructure to elastically scale you can explicitly set the 'desired' amount of servers you want in place. In this example increasing it to six (6) for production:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"You have the option rather than waiting for your infrastructure to elastically scale you can explicitly set the 'desired' amount of servers..." doesn't read right.

"You have the option rather than waiting for your infrastructure to elastically scale to explicitly set the 'desired' number of servers..." would work better.

Or possibly:
"Rather than waiting for your infratructure to automatically scale, you can explicitly set the 'desired' number of servers..."

@awinata
Copy link
Contributor

awinata commented Dec 5, 2016

This commit have been re-implemented on this: #162

Closing

@awinata awinata closed this Dec 5, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants