[pull] master from Ezard:master

[pull]

See Commits and Changes for more details.

---

Created by pull[bot]

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

[semanticdiff-com]

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

Analyzed 2 of 2 files.

	Filename	Status
✔️	functions/package-lock.json	49.5% smaller
✔️	functions/package.json	Analyzed

[restack-app]

No applications have been configured for previews targeting branch: master. To do so go to restack console and configure your applications for previews.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Auto Review Skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat with CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)

• You can directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit-tests for this file.
• You can tag CodeRabbit on specific lines of code or entire files in the PR by tagging @coderabbitai in a comment. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• You can tag @coderabbitai in a PR comment and ask questions about the PR and the codebase. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[pr-code-reviewer]

👋 Hi there!

1. Update the version of "@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin" and "@typescript-eslint/parser" from "6.15.0" to "6.16.0" in the "functions/package-lock.json" file.
2. Update the version of "@types/node" from "18.19.3" to "18.19.4" in both the "dependencies" and "node_modules/@types/node" sections of the "functions/package-lock.json" file.
3. Review any other changes made to ensure they are intended and do not introduce any errors or inconsistencies.

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

[instapr]

Overall, the changes in this pull request look good. However, I have a few suggestions for improvement:

1. Consistent formatting: Please ensure that the code follows consistent formatting throughout the changes.

2. Error handling: Consider adding appropriate error handling and error messages to provide better feedback to users in case of errors or exceptions.

3. Code comments: It would be helpful to add some code comments to explain the purpose and functionality of certain sections of code.

Please address these suggestions before merging the pull request. Good job overall!

[pr-explainer-bot]

Pull Request Report

Greetings! 👋

Here's a summary of the changes made in this pull request:

Changes

1. Updated @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin to version 6.16.0.
2. Updated @typescript-eslint/parser to version 6.16.0.

Suggestions

No suggestions for code improvement were provided.

Bugs

No potential bugs were identified in the code.

Improvements

No specific places for code refactoring were mentioned.

Rating

The code was not rated for readability, performance, and security.

That's all for now! Feel free to reach out if you have any questions. 😄

[sweep-ai]

Apply Sweep Rules to your PR?

• Apply: All new business logic should have corresponding unit tests.
• Apply: Refactor large functions to be more modular.
• Apply: Add docstrings to all functions and file headers.