Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spell check: underlines instead of highlighting? #418

Closed
elmerehbi opened this issue May 10, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Spell check: underlines instead of highlighting? #418

elmerehbi opened this issue May 10, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@elmerehbi
Copy link

I started using spell check in vim recently and they seem to underline instead of highlight. Is that set in your vimrc? And how can I change it to the default / highlighting?

Also I it seems to miss some basic typos (e.g. ompiling for compiling). What might be the source of this?

@alefisico
Copy link

I am also interested in this question. Is anybody being able to change this?

@braceletboy
Copy link

braceletboy commented Feb 16, 2019

Firstly, great job on building awesome vim @amix.
Coming to the issue, for me it's not even underlining. Can someone comment on this. I can provide my my_config.vim file if that is necessary.

@amix
Copy link
Owner

amix commented Nov 30, 2019

Please see the SpellBad/SpellCap configuration:
E.g.,

SpellBad       xxx ctermbg=9 gui=undercurl guisp=Red

@amix amix closed this as completed Nov 30, 2019
bryango added a commit to bryango/vimrc that referenced this issue Aug 6, 2022
Spellcheck colors are disabled since v3.3 of `peaksea.vim`, see: https://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=760. This commit restores the colors, thus fixing amix#418 & amix#548. See more explanations in amix#548 (comment).
amix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 15, 2022
dosongpon pushed a commit to digitalorganic/vimrc that referenced this issue Oct 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants