Something like this should fix #422

[d3x0r]

No description provided.

[sergibondarenko]

I tried your patch in my scripts #422, it didn't work

[sergibondarenko]

I still don't receive any data. Steps to reproduce are below.

1. Download your repo and checked into your patch, folder ~/dev/learn/gun/gun.

trex@beast-cave:~/dev/learn/gun/gun$ git remote -v
origin  git@github.com:d3x0r/gun.git (fetch)
origin  git@github.com:d3x0r/gun.git (push)
trex@beast-cave:~/dev/learn/gun/gun$ git branch
  master
* patch-17
trex@beast-cave:~/dev/learn/gun/gun$ git pull
Already up-to-date.

2. Have the graph tutorial data available, full data is here, folder ~/dev/learn/gun/server.

trex@beast-cave:~/dev/learn/gun/server$ head -c 200 data.json
{"person/alice":{"_":{"#":"person/alice",">":{"name":1505750977100,"age":1505750977100,"spouse":1505750977133.001,"employer":1505750977141.002}},"name":"alice","age":22,"spouse":{"#":"person/bob"},"em...

3. Run server, folder ~/dev/learn/gun/server
   Run node hapi.js

trex@beast-cave:~/dev/learn/gun/server$ cat hapi.js
const Hapi  = require('hapi')
const Inert = require('inert')
const Gun   = require('../gun/')

const server = new Hapi.Server
server.connection({ port: 8080 })
server.connections.forEach(c => Gun({ web: c.listener, file: 'data.json' }))

server.register(Inert, () => {});

server.route({
  method: 'GET',
  path: '/gun.js',
  handler: (request, reply) => reply.file('./gun.js', { confine: false })
})

server.route({
  method: 'GET',
  path: '/{param*}',
  handler: {
    directory: {
      path: __dirname,
      redirectToSlash: true,
      index: true
    }
  }
})

server.start()

4. Query data, folder ~/dev/learn/gun/graph
   Run: node graph.js

trex@beast-cave:~/dev/learn/gun/graphs$ cat graphs.js
const Gun = require('gun');
const gun = Gun({ peers:['http://localhost:8080/gun'] });
gun.get('person/alice').get('spouse').get('employer').get('employees').map().get('name').val(function(data, key){
  console.log("The employee's", key, data);
});

No results in the console output.

[sergibondarenko]

I tested this patch with my example and it worked.

[amark]

@d3x0r you are a life saver! I'm still confused why this works??? (if(!x) return versus if(x) do?) Pulling.

[d3x0r]

@amark :) because the if( x) do only does the top open/attach server part...( or rather if not set, only doesn't do the top part) the remaining ctx.on()s were being skipped with the return at the top... so this allows the on( out ) to be regsitered and trigger opening the peers as required.