Revert "Changes to do with primary particle definition as implemented" #332
Conversation
|
+test |
|
0120583: testing approved: will not be automatically merged; starting testing. If testing succeeds, merging will require further approval from 1 of @jgrosseo (Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus), @chiarazampolli (Chiara Zampolli), @qgp (Jochen Klein), @dberzano (Dario Berzano), @sawenzel (Sandro Christian Wenzel), @ktf (Giulio Eulisse), @shahor02 (Ruben Shahoyan) |
|
0120583: tests OK, approval required for merging: 1 of @jgrosseo (Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus), @chiarazampolli (Chiara Zampolli), @qgp (Jochen Klein), @dberzano (Dario Berzano), @sawenzel (Sandro Christian Wenzel), @ktf (Giulio Eulisse), @shahor02 (Ruben Shahoyan) Comment with |
|
+1 |
|
Given the impact I'd say we immediately start the validation for the new tag. |
Analysis tags depending on v5-09-10 and v5-09-11 have to be removed as per the Physics Board decision. See alisw/AliRoot#332.
Analysis tags depending on v5-09-10 and v5-09-11 have to be removed as per the Physics Board decision. See alisw/AliRoot#332.
Analysis tags depending on v5-09-10 and v5-09-11 have to be removed as per the Physics Board decision. See alisw/AliRoot#332.
3 participants
Reverts #271
After some investigations it seems that this pull request does not behave according to the expectations and creates problems with EPOS, pythia, etc. Following a request from the physics coordination I am reverting it temporarily.