Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

项目协议问题，目前看项目是LGPL和GPL协议，但看到又提到了Apache。能否确定下协议，如果是LPGL和GPL，后续有考虑改成Apache协议吗？不然使用该项目存在一些担忧 #375

Closed
yananliuyanjiang opened this issue Aug 25, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

项目协议问题，目前看项目是LGPL和GPL协议，但看到又提到了Apache。能否确定下协议，如果是LPGL和GPL，后续有考虑改成Apache协议吗？不然使用该项目存在一些担忧 #375

yananliuyanjiang opened this issue Aug 25, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@yananliuyanjiang
Copy link

No description provided.

@oldmanpushcart
Copy link
Collaborator

oldmanpushcart commented Aug 25, 2022 •
edited
Loading

就是LGPL，README中提到的Apache是写错了，我们调整过来。

@yananliuyanjiang
Copy link
Author

好的，希望能有更松散的协议推动这个项目发展。目前协议规定的比较死，大家想基于该项目创新和发展有很多顾虑

@lemon-simple
Copy link

我们前期也遇到了同样问题……

@lemon-simple
Copy link

GPL协议限制性很大，而且有强传染性哇哈哈

oldmanpushcart added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 25, 2022
@oldmanpushcart
修复问题 #375
d39e587
@oldmanpushcart
Copy link
Collaborator

@lemon-simple 我们希望市场上类似的产品，竞争力来自于module而不是sandbox本身。所以就要求sandbox必须足够开放和透明，并也强制二次开发的竞争对手开放，逼迫竞争对手将核心竞争力集中在module功能上

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@oldmanpushcart @yananliuyanjiang @lemon-simple