Skip to content

Conversation

@jannotti
Copy link
Contributor

Better checks on max txn size that will work better as we make changes.

jasonpaulos
jasonpaulos previously approved these changes Aug 29, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@jasonpaulos jasonpaulos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me, though I have some minor comments

Co-authored-by: Jason Paulos <jasonpaulos@users.noreply.github.com>
jannotti and others added 3 commits August 29, 2024 14:33
Co-authored-by: Jason Paulos <jasonpaulos@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jason Paulos <jasonpaulos@users.noreply.github.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 56.28%. Comparing base (4990077) to head (960c6c0).
Report is 12 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6114      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   56.27%   56.28%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         490      490              
  Lines       69710    69710              
==========================================
+ Hits        39230    39238       +8     
+ Misses      27817    27806      -11     
- Partials     2663     2666       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@algorandskiy algorandskiy requested a review from cce September 5, 2024 17:27
Copy link
Contributor

@algorandskiy algorandskiy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks reasonable to me

@jannotti jannotti merged commit 37a9a18 into algorand:master Sep 9, 2024
giuliop added a commit to giuliop/go-algorand that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2024
This reverts commit 91d6e09
which is not needed anymore after the merge of:
AVM: Derive looser, but more principled, checks of txn max size algorand#6114
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants