Allow Users add comments in Github.Party #2
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Like Yelp :)
akkartik
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 13, 2015
I added one test to check that divide can return a float, then hacked at the rippling failures across the entire entire codebase until all tests pass. Now I need to look at the changes I made and see if there's a system to them, identify other places that I missed, and figure out the best way to cover all cases. I also need to show real rather than encoded values in the traces, but I can't use value() inside reagent methods because of the name clash with the member variable. So let's take a snapshot before we attempt any refactoring. This was non-trivial to get right. Even if I convince myself that I've gotten it right, I might back this all out if I can't easily *persuade others* that I've gotten it right.
akkartik
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 9, 2015
(#1 was previous commit) Thanks Caleb Couch.
akkartik
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2015
- notes bug in edit/ triggers in immutable but not master branch bug triggered by changes to layer 059: we're finding an unspecialized call to 'length' in 'append_6' hard to debug because trace isn't complete just bring out the big hammer: use a new log file length_2 from recipes.mu is not being deleted (bug #1) so reload doesn't switch length to length_2 when variant_already_exists (bug #2) so we end up saving in Recipe for a primitive ordinal so no valid specialization is found for 'length' (bug #3) why doesn't it trigger in a non-interactive scenario? argh, wasn't checking for an empty line at end. ok, confidence restored.
akkartik
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 23, 2016
All my attempts at staging this change failed with this humongous commit that took all day and involved debugging three monstrous bugs. Two of the bugs had to do with forgetting to check the type name in the implementation of shape-shifting recipes. Bug #2 in particular would cause core tests in layer 59 to fail -- only when I loaded up edit/! It got me to just hack directly on mu.cc until I figured out the cause (snapshot saved in mu.cc.modified). The problem turned out to be that I accidentally saved a type ingredient in the Type table during specialization. Now I know that that can be very bad. I've checked the traces for any stray type numbers (rather than names). I also found what might be a bug from last November (labeled TODO), but we'll verify after this commit.
akkartik
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2016
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Like Yelp :)