-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Exposing SSL-only version of Postgres Source #6362
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9aaae36
first pass
cgardens 9f352a4
checkpoint for feedback
cgardens 71b2183
hack
cgardens d567fdc
fix image name in acceptance tests
cgardens b5a556c
enforce ssl for postgres normalization
cgardens 5f4b68a
various clean
cgardens 50ad203
fix test
cgardens 72069d4
so it goes
cgardens 275096c
go
cgardens 36e11d7
fix main method
cgardens aaf3eaa
fix the noise
cgardens 72ba74b
add java doc comments
cgardens File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
so it goes
- Loading branch information
commit 72069d4e33ef66dc37430a65385e2cd1e6bbc52a
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if all we're doing is modify the spec is a whole new superclass worth it? why not just extend the source directly and modify the spec method?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fair. I think we can reuse this class for all the db sources that this applies to so it gives us a nice convention to work from if we want to expand it later. i can just document it once. otherwise we're just going to extend a bunch of sources and have to explain it in a bunch of places.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
agree with @cgardens the decoration pattern makes the feature of modifying the spec more composable