fix(concurrent perpartition cursor): Increase throttle time to 10 minutes

[tolik0]

Increase the time between state messages from 1 minute to 10 minutes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Increased the minimum interval between state message emissions, reducing their frequency during incremental syncs.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The throttle interval for emitting state messages in the _throttle_state_message method was increased from 60 seconds to 600 seconds, reducing the frequency at which state messages are emitted. No changes were made to the signatures or declarations of exported or public entities.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/incremental/concurrent_partition_cursor.py	Increased the throttle interval for state message emission from 60 seconds to 600 seconds.
unit_tests/sources/declarative/incremental/test_concurrent_perpartitioncursor.py	Updated test_state_throttling to reflect new 600-second throttle interval with adjusted mocked times and assertions.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant ConcurrentPartitionCursor

    Caller->>ConcurrentPartitionCursor: Call _throttle_state_message()
    ConcurrentPartitionCursor->>ConcurrentPartitionCursor: Check time since last state message
    alt If elapsed time >= 600s
        ConcurrentPartitionCursor-->>Caller: Emit state message
    else If elapsed time < 600s
        ConcurrentPartitionCursor-->>Caller: Return None (no emission)
    end

Loading

Possibly related PRs

• feat(concurrent perpartition cursor): Add parent state updates #343: Modifies the throttle interval for emitting state messages in the same _throttle_state_message method of ConcurrentPerPartitionCursor.
• fix(cdk): fix state emit for ConcurrentPerPartitionCursor #539: Adds conditional checks to prevent state emission in the same class and method, related to state emission throttling logic.
• feat(concurrent perpartition cursor): Refactor ConcurrentPerPartitionCursor #331: Refactors ConcurrentPerPartitionCursor including changes to throttling logic and parameters in _emit_state_message.

Suggested reviewers

• maxi297

Would you like me to help draft a quick note suggesting the impact of this change on downstream components or tests, wdyt?

Tip

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching

• CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.

Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ea85761 and 158259c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• unit_tests/sources/declarative/incremental/test_concurrent_perpartitioncursor.py (2 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: Analyze (python)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

unit_tests/sources/declarative/incremental/test_concurrent_perpartitioncursor.py (1)

3267-3304: Looks good - test correctly updated for the new throttling interval!

The test has been properly adjusted to verify the new 10-minute (600 seconds) throttling interval rather than the previous 1-minute (60 seconds) interval. The timing values have been consistently updated throughout the test: first attempt at 100s, second at 300s (both below threshold), and final attempt at 700s (above threshold). This matches the PR objective of increasing the throttle time for state message emission.

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/incremental/concurrent_partition_cursor.py (1)

231-236: State message throttling interval increased from 1 minute to 10 minutes.

The throttle interval for state message emission has been increased from 60 seconds to 600 seconds (10 minutes). This change should reduce the overhead associated with frequent state emissions.

Would it be helpful to add a comment explaining why this throttle change was made? Perhaps mentioning the performance benefits or any specific issues it resolves? This would help future maintainers understand the reasoning behind this specific timing value, wdyt?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d7ebfd9 and ea85761.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/incremental/concurrent_partition_cursor.py (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)

• GitHub Check: Check: 'source-hardcoded-records' (skip=false)
• GitHub Check: Check: 'source-shopify' (skip=false)
• GitHub Check: Check: 'source-amplitude' (skip=false)
• GitHub Check: Pytest (Fast)
• GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.11, Ubuntu)
• GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.10, Ubuntu)