Adjust client payload benchmarks to better represent real world cases

[bdraco]

We are interested in benchmarking various payload sizes at different buffering cut offs to see the memcpy and buffering impacts

2048 was too high as most small payloads are < 1024
32768 was two high as it always did two reads for this case so it wasn't giving us a case for a single large read.
1MiB was fine but 512KiB is also fine as it still gives us a benchmark for a multi-read case but there was no need to go that high as it didn't change the profile and only made the benchmark run longer

Note I'm testing on mac. I'm going to test on linux shortly since thats where the bulk of our users are. The breakpoints are going to be dictated by the kernel. If the linux buffer sizes are lower by default, I'll adjust the 2nd one down some more. Ideally we keep it as high as possible to see the memcpy effects but not so high that the message ends up in multiple reads

The 30000 size is good for linux as well as it results in a single read.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #9835 will not alter performance

_{Comparing adjust_client_payload_benchmarks (3e25382) with master (14fcfd4)}

Summary

✅ 17 untouched benchmarks

🆕 6 new benchmarks
⁉️ 6 (👁 6) dropped benchmarks

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	master	adjust_client_payload_benchmarks	Change
🆕	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_1024_chunked_payload[pyloop]	N/A	38.8 ms	N/A
🆕	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_1024_content_length_payload[pyloop]	N/A	38.6 ms	N/A
👁	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_1mib_chunked_payload[pyloop]	320 ms	N/A	N/A
👁	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_1mib_content_length_payload[pyloop]	300.2 ms	N/A	N/A
👁	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_2048_chunked_payload[pyloop]	39 ms	N/A	N/A
👁	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_2048_content_length_payload[pyloop]	38.8 ms	N/A	N/A
🆕	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_30000_chunked_payload[pyloop]	N/A	48 ms	N/A
🆕	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_30000_content_length_payload[pyloop]	N/A	42.6 ms	N/A
👁	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_32768_chunked_payload[pyloop]	49 ms	N/A	N/A
👁	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_32768_content_length_payload[pyloop]	43.1 ms	N/A	N/A
🆕	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_512kib_chunked_payload[pyloop]	N/A	262.3 ms	N/A
🆕	test_one_hundred_get_requests_with_512kib_content_length_payload[pyloop]	N/A	180.8 ms	N/A

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.70%. Comparing base (14fcfd4) to head (3e25382).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #9835   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.70%   98.70%           
=======================================
  Files         118      118           
  Lines       36148    36148           
  Branches     4294     4294           
=======================================
  Hits        35680    35680           
  Misses        315      315           
  Partials      153      153           

Flag	Coverage Δ
CI-GHA	98.59% <100.00%> (ø)
OS-Linux	98.27% <100.00%> (ø)
OS-Windows	96.07% <100.00%> (ø)
OS-macOS	97.35% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-3.10.11	97.20% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Py-3.10.15	97.76% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-3.11.10	97.80% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-3.11.9	97.25% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-3.12.7	98.35% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-3.13.0	98.32% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
Py-3.9.13	97.12% <100.00%> (ø)
Py-3.9.20	97.72% <100.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️
Py-pypy7.3.16	97.29% <100.00%> (ø)
VM-macos	97.35% <100.00%> (ø)
VM-ubuntu	98.27% <100.00%> (ø)
VM-windows	96.07% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[patchback]

Backport to 3.10: 💚 backport PR created

✅ Backport PR branch: patchback/backports/3.10/32ccfc9a19c63041c3e0f3166f9e14ba16b113e6/pr-9835

Backported as #9836

🤖 @patchback
I'm built with octomachinery and
my source is open — https://github.com/sanitizers/patchback-github-app.

[patchback]

Backport to 3.11: 💚 backport PR created

✅ Backport PR branch: patchback/backports/3.11/32ccfc9a19c63041c3e0f3166f9e14ba16b113e6/pr-9835

Backported as #9837

🤖 @patchback
I'm built with octomachinery and
my source is open — https://github.com/sanitizers/patchback-github-app.