-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
Search notebook update #933
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b72580e
Added tests for online dfs agent
ad71 fa7dd42
Minor formatting fixes
ad71 558b062
Completed notebook sections
ad71 05327a0
Updated README.md
ad71 263e2f1
Fixed a test
ad71 52444b0
Added new algorithms to display_visual notebook function
ad71 eeaa18b
Added RBFS visualization
ad71 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is probably ok, but are you sure that there isn't another solution of equal length?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@norvig , there is in fact another solution of equal length
but this algorithm (or any search algorithm for that matter) gives one particular optimal solution every time, even if there exists another one of the same length. This happens due to an implementational detail in
EightPuzzle
.In the
EightPuzzle
class, theactions
method returns the possible actions, but the actions are stored in a list and every timenode.expand(problem)
is called from RBFS, the neighbors are traversed in the order [up, down, left, right], which is why the algorithm converges to the same solution every time. I also ran it for 1000 cycles just to make sure.This can be fixed (though I don't think it requires fixing) by returning a
set
of possible actions instead of alist
, but a lot of tests will be rendered useless.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To keep it simple, I'll accept this as is, but it would be a better test if it didn't rely on an arbitrary choice of ordering.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is, the test could be something like :
achieves_goal(start, s) and len(s) == 8
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, I'll take care of this in the next update