Skip to content

Added missing tests #854

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 17, 2018
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
32 changes: 26 additions & 6 deletions tests/test_logic.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ def test_dpll():
assert (dpll_satisfiable(A & ~B & C & (A | ~D) & (~E | ~D) & (C | ~D) & (~A | ~F) & (E | ~F)
& (~D | ~F) & (B | ~C | D) & (A | ~E | F) & (~A | E | D))
== {B: False, C: True, A: True, F: False, D: True, E: False})
assert dpll_satisfiable(A & B & ~C & D) == {C: False, A: True, D: True, B: True}
assert dpll_satisfiable((A | (B & C)) |'<=>'| ((A | B) & (A | C))) == {C: True, A: True} or {C: True, B: True}
assert dpll_satisfiable(A |'<=>'| B) == {A: True, B: True}
assert dpll_satisfiable(A & ~B) == {A: True, B: False}
assert dpll_satisfiable(P & ~P) is False

Expand All @@ -154,6 +157,9 @@ def test_find_unit_clause():
def test_unify():
assert unify(x, x, {}) == {}
assert unify(x, 3, {}) == {x: 3}
assert unify(x & 4 & y, 6 & y & 4, {}) == {x: 6, y: 4}
assert unify(expr('A(x)'), expr('A(B)')) == {x: B}
assert unify(expr('American(x) & Weapon(B)'), expr('American(A) & Weapon(y)')) == {x: A, y: B}


def test_pl_fc_entails():
Expand All @@ -169,6 +175,9 @@ def test_tt_entails():
assert tt_entails(P & Q, Q)
assert not tt_entails(P | Q, Q)
assert tt_entails(A & (B | C) & E & F & ~(P | Q), A & E & F & ~P & ~Q)
assert not tt_entails(P |'<=>'| Q, Q)
assert tt_entails((P |'==>'| Q) & P, Q)
assert not tt_entails((P |'<=>'| Q) & ~P, Q)


def test_prop_symbols():
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -222,30 +231,39 @@ def test_move_not_inwards():


def test_distribute_and_over_or():
def test_enatilment(s, has_and = False):
def test_entailment(s, has_and = False):
result = distribute_and_over_or(s)
if has_and:
assert result.op == '&'
assert tt_entails(s, result)
assert tt_entails(result, s)
test_enatilment((A & B) | C, True)
test_enatilment((A | B) & C, True)
test_enatilment((A | B) | C, False)
test_enatilment((A & B) | (C | D), True)
test_entailment((A & B) | C, True)
test_entailment((A | B) & C, True)
test_entailment((A | B) | C, False)
test_entailment((A & B) | (C | D), True)


def test_to_cnf():
assert (repr(to_cnf(wumpus_world_inference & ~expr('~P12'))) ==
"((~P12 | B11) & (~P21 | B11) & (P12 | P21 | ~B11) & ~B11 & P12)")
assert repr(to_cnf((P & Q) | (~P & ~Q))) == '((~P | P) & (~Q | P) & (~P | Q) & (~Q | Q))'
assert repr(to_cnf('A <=> B')) == '((A | ~B) & (B | ~A))'
assert repr(to_cnf("B <=> (P1 | P2)")) == '((~P1 | B) & (~P2 | B) & (P1 | P2 | ~B))'
assert repr(to_cnf('A <=> (B & C)')) == '((A | ~B | ~C) & (B | ~A) & (C | ~A))'
assert repr(to_cnf("a | (b & c) | d")) == '((b | a | d) & (c | a | d))'
assert repr(to_cnf("A & (B | (D & E))")) == '(A & (D | B) & (E | B))'
assert repr(to_cnf("A | (B | (C | (D & E)))")) == '((D | A | B | C) & (E | A | B | C))'
assert repr(to_cnf('(A <=> ~B) ==> (C | ~D)')) == '((B | ~A | C | ~D) & (A | ~A | C | ~D) & (B | ~B | C | ~D) & (A | ~B | C | ~D))'


def test_pl_resolution():
# TODO: Add fast test cases
assert pl_resolution(wumpus_kb, ~P11)
assert pl_resolution(wumpus_kb, ~B11)
assert not pl_resolution(wumpus_kb, P22)
assert pl_resolution(horn_clauses_KB, A)
assert pl_resolution(horn_clauses_KB, B)
assert not pl_resolution(horn_clauses_KB, P)
assert not pl_resolution(definite_clauses_KB, P)


def test_standardize_variables():
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -302,8 +320,10 @@ def check_SAT(clauses, single_solution={}):
check_SAT([A & B, A & C])
check_SAT([A | B, P & Q, P & B])
check_SAT([A & B, C | D, ~(D | P)], {A: True, B: True, C: True, D: False, P: False})
check_SAT([A, B, ~C, D], {C: False, A: True, B: True, D: True})
# Test WalkSat for problems without solution
assert WalkSAT([A & ~A], 0.5, 100) is None
assert WalkSAT([A & B, C | D, ~(D | B)], 0.5, 100) is None
assert WalkSAT([A | B, ~A, ~(B | C), C | D, P | Q], 0.5, 100) is None
assert WalkSAT([A | B, B & C, C | D, D & A, P, ~P], 0.5, 100) is None

Expand Down