Skip to content

Intra-chromosomal interactions and Long Range are less #390

@Nitin123-4

Description

@Nitin123-4

Sequenced Read Pairs: 484,493,424
Normal Paired: 190,007,817 (39.22%)
Chimeric Paired: 186,242,031 (38.44%)
Collisions: 12,301,495 (2.54%)
Low MAPQ Collisions: 5,908,629 (1.22%)
Unmapped: 1,950,479 (0.40%)
MAPQ 0: 88,082,973 (18.18%)
Ligation Motif Present: 0 (0.00%)
Alignable (Normal+Chimeric Paired): 376,249,848 (77.66%)
Unique Reads: 258,163,483 (53.29%)
PCR Duplicates: 84,090,529 (17.36%)
Optical Duplicates: 33,995,836 (7.02%)
Library Complexity Estimate: 577,006,879
Intra-fragment Reads: 0 (0.00% / 0.00%)
Hi-C Contacts: 220,114,859 (45.43% / 85.26%)
Ligation Motif Present: 0 (0.00% / 0.00%)
3' Bias (Long Range): 50% - 50%
Pair Type %(L-I-O-R): 25% - 25% - 25% - 25%
Inter-chromosomal: 127,856,830 (26.39% / 49.53%)
Intra-chromosomal: 92,258,029 (19.04% / 35.74%)
Short Range (<20Kb): 56,423,024 (11.65% / 21.86%)
Long Range (>20Kb): 35,824,869 (7.39% / 13.88%)

2026.01.08.22.50.13.HiCImage.pdf

I can see Intra-chromosomal interactions are less. We expect to see much more than this.
we expect to see we expect to see ~20% or fewer Inter-chromosomal interactions. Is there any issue with HIC library preparation? also attached HIC contact map for inter_30.hic.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions